[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20121003114721.GA16209@infradead.org>
Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2012 07:47:21 -0400
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To: "Nicholas A. Bellinger" <nab@...ux-iscsi.org>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
target-devel <target-devel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-scsi <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Mike Christie <michaelc@...wisc.edu>,
Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.de>,
Roland Dreier <roland@...estorage.com>,
Andy Grover <agrover@...hat.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] target/file: Re-enable optional fd_buffered_io=1
operation
On Tue, Oct 02, 2012 at 01:16:44PM -0700, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote:
> * Optionally allow fd_buffered_io=1 to be enabled for people
> * who want use the fs buffer cache as an WriteCache mechanism.
> *
> * This means that in event of a hard failure, there is a risk
> * of silent data-loss if the SCSI client has *not* performed a
> * forced unit access (FUA) write, or issued SYNCHRONIZE_CACHE
> * to write-out the entire device cache.
> */
Oh, I get Vlads flame. This doesn't simply disable O_DSYNC now but also
sets WCE=1. In this case I don't really get the point of the patch, why
can't we simply set it from configfs?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists