[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1210031450220.29232@kaball.uk.xensource.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2012 14:51:59 +0100
From: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@...citrix.com>
To: Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@...rix.com>
CC: Stefano Stabellini <Stefano.Stabellini@...citrix.com>,
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>,
"xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com" <xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] xen: point xen_start_info to a dummy struct
for PV on HVM guests
On Wed, 3 Oct 2012, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-10-03 at 14:37 +0100, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > PV on HVM guests don't have a start_info page mapped by Xen, so
> > xen_start_info is just NULL for them.
> > That is problem because other parts of the code expect xen_start_info to
> > point to something valid, for example xen_initial_domain() is defined as
> > follow:
> >
> > #define xen_initial_domain() (xen_domain() && \
> > xen_start_info->flags & SIF_INITDOMAIN)
>
> But anyone who calls this before xen_start_info is setup is going to get
> a bogus result, specifically in this case they will think they are domU
> when in reality they are dom0 -- wouldn't it be better to fix those
> callsites?
That cannot be the case because setting up xen_start_info is the very
first thing that is done, before even calling to C.
> Perhaps turn this into a static inline with a BUG_ON(!xen_start_info) to
> make catching these cases easier?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists