[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20121003150812.GC8460@kroah.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2012 08:08:12 -0700
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>,
linux-usb@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/7] usb: core: reuse kbasename()
On Wed, Oct 03, 2012 at 11:27:27AM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 6:00 PM, Andy Shevchenko
> <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
>
> > --- a/drivers/usb/core/file.c
> > +++ b/drivers/usb/core/file.c
>
> > @@ -200,14 +200,9 @@ int usb_register_dev(struct usb_interface *intf,
> >
> > /* create a usb class device for this usb interface */
> > snprintf(name, sizeof(name), class_driver->name, minor - minor_base);
> > - temp = strrchr(name, '/');
> > - if (temp && (temp[1] != '\0'))
> I have checked current linux-next, the drivers define .name in the
> usb_class_driver structure as '...%d'.
> So, what is the reason to check for trailing '/' here? Historical
> reasons or there is a (broken/3rd party/etc) driver with it?
I really do not remember why it was done this way, sorry. I have no
problem not doing it anymore, as long as you are willing to fix any
potential bugs that might pop up :)
And no, I don't worry about 3rd party drivers, that shouldn't be an
issue at all here.
greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists