linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v6 0/25] Generic Red-Black Trees

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <506C572E.8020403@att.net>
Date:	Wed, 03 Oct 2012 10:18:06 -0500
From:	Daniel Santos <danielfsantos@....net>
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
CC:	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>,
	Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
	David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 0/25] Generic Red-Black Trees

On 10/01/2012 03:47 PM, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Mon, 01 Oct 2012 15:41:14 -0500
> Daniel Santos <danielfsantos@....net> wrote:
>
>> I can rebase against whatever you like and send either corrections or an
>> updated patch set. Just tell me what works please.
> I dropped everything - let's start again.
I would have sent you my updated patch set, but both -mmotm and -next
are broken on my hardware at the moment and I can't properly re-test.  I
posted a bug here: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=48241
(with early boot jpg).  I can rebase it against Linus maybe for testing
(just a few changes).

I did use gcc 4.7.1, so I'm going to try using gcc 4.6.3 just to make
sure it's not that.  But it looks like I may have a few more changes to
make anyway.

Daniel
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/