linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V3 0/3] PNP: Allow PNP resources to be disabled (interface)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 03 Oct 2012 17:57:25 +0200
From:	Witold Szczeponik <Witold.Szczeponik@....net>
To:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>, bhelgaas@...gle.com,
	lenb@...nel.org
CC:	Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 0/3] PNP: Allow PNP resources to be disabled (interface)

On 18/09/12 23:42, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On Sunday, September 16, 2012, Witold Szczeponik wrote:
>> Hi Rafael, 
>>
>> what about the patches 1 and 3 which do not make any changes to the ABI?
>> The first patch simplifies the code, while the third patch fixes a problem in
>> the PNP resource allocation.  Any chances to have them included in 3.7?
> 
> They would be fine as far as I'm concerned, but I'm not maintaining that part
> of the kernel (at least at the moment).
> 
> I'm not sure who's the maintainer of it, to be honest.

According to the maintainer list, this would be Len and Bjorn.  
Hence...


Len and Bjorn, 

any chances to include the patches in 3.7?  I checked them 
against 3.6 and they applied without any change.  Or should 
I resend them individually? 

Thanks. 

--- Witold

> 
> Thanks,
> Rafael
> 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/