[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAM=Q2cv7Qc9Up5b_033uwaunnBz1mB4UWbb1bh9TGzX5=FxFrg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2012 21:44:09 +0530
From: Shubhrajyoti Datta <omaplinuxkernel@...il.com>
To: Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@...il.com>
Cc: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>,
Stephane Chatty <chatty@...c.fr>, fabien.andre@...il.com,
scott.liu@....com.tw, Jean Delvare <khali@...ux-fr.org>,
Ben Dooks <ben-linux@...ff.org>,
Wolfram Sang <w.sang@...gutronix.de>,
linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org, linux-input@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] i2c-hid: introduce HID over i2c specification implementation
On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 9:03 PM, Benjamin Tissoires
<benjamin.tissoires@...il.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> thanks also for the review. Two in the same day! I was about to send a
> ping on that patch.... ;-)
>
> On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 8:05 AM, Shubhrajyoti Datta
> <omaplinuxkernel@...il.com> wrote:
>> On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 7:11 PM, benjamin.tissoires
>> <benjamin.tissoires@...il.com> wrote:
>>> From: Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@...c.fr>
>>>
>>> Microsoft published the protocol specification of HID over i2c:
>>> http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/hardware/hh852380.aspx
>>>
>>> This patch introduces an implementation of this protocol.
>>>
>>> This implementation does not includes the ACPI part of the specification.
>>> This will come when ACPI 5.0 devices will be available.
>>>
>>> Once the ACPI part will be done, OEM will not have to declare HID over I2C
>>> devices in their platform specific driver.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@...c.fr>
>>> ---
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> this is finally my first implementation of HID over I2C.
>>>
>>> This has been tested on an Elan Microelectronics HID over I2C device, with
>>> a Samsung Exynos 4412 board.
>>>
>>> Any comments are welcome.
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Benjamin
>>>
>>> drivers/i2c/Kconfig | 8 +
>>> drivers/i2c/Makefile | 1 +
>>> drivers/i2c/i2c-hid.c | 1027 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>> include/linux/i2c/i2c-hid.h | 35 ++
>>> 4 files changed, 1071 insertions(+)
>>> create mode 100644 drivers/i2c/i2c-hid.c
>>> create mode 100644 include/linux/i2c/i2c-hid.h
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/Kconfig b/drivers/i2c/Kconfig
>>
[...]
>
> same thing, will change it in v2.
>
>>
>>> +
>>> + if (debug)
>>> + dev_err(&client->dev, "resetting...\n");
>> this is a little uncustomary.
>>
>> May be consider bdg
>
> Sorry for that. I don't get your point here. You don't like the whole
> "if(debug) dev_err(...)" or just the "dev_err(...)" call?
>
Apologies for the typo dev_dbg.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists