[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+55aFwpmUPF4MR+rVJ=MOYGseWGN9DvMTivbwxQ4gh_izrryg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2012 10:00:43 -0700
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...hat.com>,
Ming Lei <ming.lei@...onical.com>
Cc: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, Kay Sievers <kay@...y.org>,
Lennart Poettering <lennart@...ttering.net>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Kay Sievers <kay@...hat.com>,
Linux Media Mailing List <linux-media@...r.kernel.org>,
Michael Krufky <mkrufky@...uxtv.org>,
Ivan Kalvachev <ikalvachev@...il.com>
Subject: Re: udev breakages - was: Re: Need of an ".async_probe()" type of
callback at driver's core - Was: Re: [PATCH] [media] drxk: change it to use request_firmware_nowait()
On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 9:38 AM, Linus Torvalds
<torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
>
> Anyway. Attached is a really stupid patch that tries to do the "direct
> firmware load" as suggested by Ivan. It has not been tested very
> extensively at all (but I did test that it loaded the brcmsmac
> firmware images on my laptop so it has the *potential* to work).
Oh, and I stupidly put the new functions next to the builtin firmware
loading function, which means that the patch only works if you have
CONFIG_FW_LOADER enabled.
That's bogus, and the functions should be moved out of that #ifdef,
but I don't think it should hurt testing.
Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists