[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+55aFw9-8cfcGrnLhjDn_zoq44TbSByPkqxkPquUsk=x+Ez9g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2012 15:17:15 -0700
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.de.marchi@...il.com>
Cc: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...hat.com>,
Ming Lei <ming.lei@...onical.com>, Kay Sievers <kay@...y.org>,
Lennart Poettering <lennart@...ttering.net>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Kay Sievers <kay@...hat.com>,
Linux Media Mailing List <linux-media@...r.kernel.org>,
Michael Krufky <mkrufky@...uxtv.org>,
Ivan Kalvachev <ikalvachev@...il.com>
Subject: Re: udev breakages - was: Re: Need of an ".async_probe()" type of
callback at driver's core - Was: Re: [PATCH] [media] drxk: change it to use request_firmware_nowait()
On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 2:58 PM, Lucas De Marchi
<lucas.de.marchi@...il.com> wrote:
>
> So maintaining the fallback or adding a configurable entry to set the
> firmware paths might be good.
Yeah, I do think we need to make it configurable. Probably both at
kernel compile time and dynamically.
The aim of having a user-mode daemon do this was that it would be easy
to configure. Sadly, if we can't trust the daemon, that is all totally
worthless.
Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists