[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <506BCCAE.5030203@zytor.com>
Date: Tue, 02 Oct 2012 22:27:10 -0700
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: Matthew Garrett <mjg@...hat.com>
CC: T Makphaibulchoke <tmac@...com>, tglx@...utronix.de,
mingo@...hat.com, x86@...nel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
yinghai@...nel.org, tiwai@...e.de, viro@...iv.linux.org.uk,
aarcange@...hat.com, tony.luck@...el.com, mgorman@...e.de,
weiyang@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, octavian.purdila@...el.com,
paul.gortmaker@...driver.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix devmem_is_allowed for below 1MB accesses for an efi
machine
On 10/02/2012 10:15 PM, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 02, 2012 at 09:44:16PM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>
>> We *always* expose the I/O regions to /dev/mem. That is what /dev/mem
>> *does*. The above is an exception (which is really obsolete, too: we
>> should simply disallow access to anything which is treated as system
>> RAM, which doesn't include the BIOS regions in question; the only reason
>> we don't is that some versions of X take a checksum of the RAM in the
>> first megabyte as some kind of idiotic random seed.)
>
> Oh, right, got you. In that case I think we potentially need a
> finer-grained check on EFI platforms - the EFI memory map is kind enough
> to tell us the difference between unusable regions and io regions, and
> we could avoid access to the unusable ones.
>
Well, we have the same in BIOS space with "reserved" regions. The
problem is that they are actually I/O regions as far as programs like X,
dmidecode and so on.
-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists