[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <96119AB6-3DCC-460E-BD40-98DC3BB8D4B4@suse.de>
Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2012 12:54:45 +0200
From: Alexander Graf <agraf@...e.de>
To: Anton Blanchard <anton@...ba.org>
Cc: Nishanth Aravamudan <nacc@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
LKML List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@...ldses.org>,
skinsbursky@...allels.com, bfields@...hat.com,
linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc/iommu: Fix multiple issues with IOMMU pools code
Hi Anton,
On 04.10.2012, at 06:57, Anton Blanchard wrote:
>
> Hi Alex,
>
> Looks to be a preempt issue with the iommu pools code. I did find a
> couple more bugs along the way too.
>
> Anton
> --
>
> There are a number of issues in the recent IOMMU pools code:
>
> - On a preempt kernel we might switch CPUs in the middle of building
> a scatter gather list. When this happens the handle hint passed in
> no longer falls within the local CPU's pool. Check for this and
> fall back to the pool hint.
>
> - We were missing a spin_unlock/spin_lock in one spot where we
> switch pools.
>
> - We need to provide locking around dart_tlb_invalidate_all and
> dart_tlb_invalidate_one now that the global lock is gone.
>
> Reported-by: Alexander Graf <agraf@...e.de>
> Signed-off-by: Anton Blanchard <anton@...ba.org>
> ---
>
> There is still an issue with the lazy u3 flushing, but I wanted
> to get this out for testing.
Yup. It fixes the nfs problem on my U4 based machine.
Tested-by: Alexander Graf <agraf@...e.de>
Alex
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists