[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <506D7799.2090307@ti.com>
Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2012 17:18:41 +0530
From: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@...com>
To: Matt Porter <mporter@...com>
CC: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"Hans J. Koch" <hjk@...sjkoch.de>,
Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux ARM Kernel List <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Linux DaVinci Kernel List
<davinci-linux-open-source@...ux.davincidsp.com>,
Ben Gardiner <bengardiner@...ometrics.ca>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/6] ARM: davinci: sram: ioremap the davinci_soc_info
specified sram regions
On 10/3/2012 8:25 PM, Matt Porter wrote:
> From: Ben Gardiner <bengardiner@...ometrics.ca>
>
> The current davinci init sets up SRAM in iotables. There has been an observed
> failure to boot a da850 with 128K specified in the iotable.
>
> Make the davinci sram allocator -- now based on RMK's consolidated SRAM
> support -- do an ioremap of the region specified by the entries in
The part about being based on RMK's consolidated SRAM support should be
dropped.
> davinci_soc_info before registering with gen_pool_add_virt().
>
> This commit breaks runtime of davinci boards since the regions that
> the sram init is now trying to ioremap have been iomapped by their
> iotable entries. The iotable entries will be removed in the patches
> to come.
I would prefer merging 2/6 into this for this reason.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ben Gardiner <bengardiner@...ometrics.ca>
> [rebased to mainline as the consolidated SRAM support was dropped]
> Signed-off-by: Matt Porter <mporter@...com>
> ---
> arch/arm/mach-davinci/sram.c | 17 ++++++++++++++---
> 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-davinci/sram.c b/arch/arm/mach-davinci/sram.c
> index db0f778..0e8ca4f 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-davinci/sram.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-davinci/sram.c
> @@ -10,6 +10,7 @@
> */
> #include <linux/module.h>
> #include <linux/init.h>
> +#include <linux/io.h>
> #include <linux/genalloc.h>
>
> #include <mach/common.h>
> @@ -32,7 +33,7 @@ void *sram_alloc(size_t len, dma_addr_t *dma)
> return NULL;
>
> if (dma)
> - *dma = dma_base + (vaddr - SRAM_VIRT);
> + *dma = gen_pool_virt_to_phys(sram_pool, vaddr);
> return (void *)vaddr;
>
> }
> @@ -53,8 +54,10 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(sram_free);
> */
> static int __init sram_init(void)
> {
> + phys_addr_t phys = davinci_soc_info.sram_dma;
> unsigned len = davinci_soc_info.sram_len;
> int status = 0;
> + void *addr;
>
> if (len) {
> len = min_t(unsigned, len, SRAM_SIZE);
> @@ -62,8 +65,16 @@ static int __init sram_init(void)
> if (!sram_pool)
> status = -ENOMEM;
> }
> - if (sram_pool)
> - status = gen_pool_add(sram_pool, SRAM_VIRT, len, -1);
> +
> + if (sram_pool) {
> + addr = ioremap(phys, len);
> + if (!addr)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> + if((status = gen_pool_add_virt(sram_pool, (unsigned)addr,
> + phys, len, -1)))
Nit: prefer to set status outside of if().
Looks good otherwise. Thanks for reviving this.
Thanks,
Sekhar
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists