[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <201210041217.28343.arnd@arndb.de>
Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2012 12:17:28 +0000
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Cc: Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>, sameo@...ux.intel.com,
ashish.jangam@...tcummins.com, dchen@...semi.com,
kernel@...gutronix.de, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@...escale.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6] mfd: da9052: Introduce da9052-irq.c
On Thursday 04 October 2012, Mark Brown wrote:
> Aside from hiding the lookup of the irqdomian a bit there's a couple of
> reasons for existing devices having them:
>
> - With some devices like WM8994 the interrupts are optional so it's
> useful to eat errors due to the interrupts not existing. With the
> ability to use linear domains this doesn't matter terribly much as we
> can just allocate the interrupts even if there's no way they can
> fire, it was more of an issue when irqdomain wasn't available.
>
> - With Arizona we've actually got a bunch of interrupt controllers the
> interrupts might be allocated to and these functions allow us to hide
> this mapping from the subdrivers. This is pretty specialist though.
>
> but if the interrupts are always requestable it really makes little
> odds, just a matter of taste.
Ok, thanks for the explanation. Since this was my only concern on this
version of the series:
Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists