| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20121004131829.GC9158@phenom.dumpdata.com>
Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2012 09:18:30 -0400
From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad@...nel.org>
To: Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@...el.com>
Cc: konrad.wilk@...cle.com, tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com,
hpa@...or.com, rob@...dley.net, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
joerg.roedel@....com, bhelgaas@...gle.com, shuahkhan@...il.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devel@...uxdriverproject.org,
x86@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 2/7] swiotlb: Make io_tlb_start a physical address
instead of a virtual address
On Wed, Oct 03, 2012 at 05:38:53PM -0700, Alexander Duyck wrote:
> This change makes it so that io_tlb_start contains a physical address instead
> of a virtual address. The advantage to this is that we can avoid costly
> translations between virtual and physical addresses when comparing the
> io_tlb_start against DMA addresses.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@...el.com>
> ---
>
> lib/swiotlb.c | 61 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------------
> 1 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/lib/swiotlb.c b/lib/swiotlb.c
> index 5cc4d4e..02abb72 100644
> --- a/lib/swiotlb.c
> +++ b/lib/swiotlb.c
> @@ -57,7 +57,7 @@ int swiotlb_force;
> * swiotlb_tbl_sync_single_*, to see if the memory was in fact allocated by this
> * API.
> */
> -static char *io_tlb_start;
> +phys_addr_t io_tlb_start;
>
> /*
> * The number of IO TLB blocks (in groups of 64).
> @@ -125,14 +125,15 @@ static dma_addr_t swiotlb_virt_to_bus(struct device *hwdev,
> void swiotlb_print_info(void)
> {
> unsigned long bytes = io_tlb_nslabs << IO_TLB_SHIFT;
> - phys_addr_t pstart, pend;
> + unsigned char *vstart, *vend;
>
> - pstart = virt_to_phys(io_tlb_start);
> - pend = pstart + bytes;
> + vstart = phys_to_virt(io_tlb_start);
> + vend = vstart + bytes;
>
> printk(KERN_INFO "software IO TLB [mem %#010llx-%#010llx] (%luMB) mapped at [%p-%p]\n",
> - (unsigned long long)pstart, (unsigned long long)pend - 1,
> - bytes >> 20, io_tlb_start, io_tlb_start + bytes - 1);
> + (unsigned long long)io_tlb_start,
> + (unsigned long long)io_tlb_start + bytes - 1,
> + bytes >> 20, vstart, vend - 1);
> }
>
> void __init swiotlb_init_with_tbl(char *tlb, unsigned long nslabs, int verbose)
> @@ -142,7 +143,7 @@ void __init swiotlb_init_with_tbl(char *tlb, unsigned long nslabs, int verbose)
> bytes = nslabs << IO_TLB_SHIFT;
>
> io_tlb_nslabs = nslabs;
> - io_tlb_start = tlb;
> + io_tlb_start = __pa(tlb);
Why not 'virt_to_phys' ?
>
> /*
> * Allocate and initialize the free list array. This array is used
> @@ -171,6 +172,7 @@ void __init swiotlb_init_with_tbl(char *tlb, unsigned long nslabs, int verbose)
> static void __init
> swiotlb_init_with_default_size(size_t default_size, int verbose)
> {
> + unsigned char *vstart;
> unsigned long bytes;
>
> if (!io_tlb_nslabs) {
> @@ -183,11 +185,11 @@ swiotlb_init_with_default_size(size_t default_size, int verbose)
> /*
> * Get IO TLB memory from the low pages
> */
> - io_tlb_start = alloc_bootmem_low_pages(PAGE_ALIGN(bytes));
> - if (!io_tlb_start)
> + vstart = alloc_bootmem_low_pages(PAGE_ALIGN(bytes));
> + if (!vstart)
> panic("Cannot allocate SWIOTLB buffer");
>
> - swiotlb_init_with_tbl(io_tlb_start, io_tlb_nslabs, verbose);
> + swiotlb_init_with_tbl(vstart, io_tlb_nslabs, verbose);
> }
>
> void __init
> @@ -205,6 +207,7 @@ int
> swiotlb_late_init_with_default_size(size_t default_size)
> {
> unsigned long bytes, req_nslabs = io_tlb_nslabs;
> + unsigned char *vstart = NULL;
> unsigned int order;
> int rc = 0;
>
> @@ -221,14 +224,14 @@ swiotlb_late_init_with_default_size(size_t default_size)
> bytes = io_tlb_nslabs << IO_TLB_SHIFT;
>
> while ((SLABS_PER_PAGE << order) > IO_TLB_MIN_SLABS) {
> - io_tlb_start = (void *)__get_free_pages(GFP_DMA | __GFP_NOWARN,
> - order);
> - if (io_tlb_start)
> + vstart = (void *)__get_free_pages(GFP_DMA | __GFP_NOWARN,
> + order);
> + if (vstart)
> break;
> order--;
> }
>
> - if (!io_tlb_start) {
> + if (!vstart) {
> io_tlb_nslabs = req_nslabs;
> return -ENOMEM;
> }
> @@ -237,9 +240,9 @@ swiotlb_late_init_with_default_size(size_t default_size)
> "for software IO TLB\n", (PAGE_SIZE << order) >> 20);
> io_tlb_nslabs = SLABS_PER_PAGE << order;
> }
> - rc = swiotlb_late_init_with_tbl(io_tlb_start, io_tlb_nslabs);
> + rc = swiotlb_late_init_with_tbl(vstart, io_tlb_nslabs);
> if (rc)
> - free_pages((unsigned long)io_tlb_start, order);
> + free_pages((unsigned long)vstart, order);
> return rc;
> }
>
> @@ -251,9 +254,9 @@ swiotlb_late_init_with_tbl(char *tlb, unsigned long nslabs)
> bytes = nslabs << IO_TLB_SHIFT;
>
> io_tlb_nslabs = nslabs;
> - io_tlb_start = tlb;
> + io_tlb_start = virt_to_phys(tlb);
>
> - memset(io_tlb_start, 0, bytes);
> + memset(tlb, 0, bytes);
>
> /*
> * Allocate and initialize the free list array. This array is used
> @@ -300,7 +303,7 @@ cleanup3:
> sizeof(int)));
> io_tlb_list = NULL;
> cleanup2:
> - io_tlb_start = NULL;
> + io_tlb_start = 0;
> io_tlb_nslabs = 0;
> return -ENOMEM;
> }
> @@ -317,7 +320,7 @@ void __init swiotlb_free(void)
> get_order(io_tlb_nslabs * sizeof(phys_addr_t)));
> free_pages((unsigned long)io_tlb_list, get_order(io_tlb_nslabs *
> sizeof(int)));
> - free_pages((unsigned long)io_tlb_start,
> + free_pages((unsigned long)phys_to_virt(io_tlb_start),
> get_order(io_tlb_nslabs << IO_TLB_SHIFT));
> } else {
> free_bootmem_late(__pa(io_tlb_overflow_buffer),
> @@ -326,7 +329,7 @@ void __init swiotlb_free(void)
> PAGE_ALIGN(io_tlb_nslabs * sizeof(phys_addr_t)));
> free_bootmem_late(__pa(io_tlb_list),
> PAGE_ALIGN(io_tlb_nslabs * sizeof(int)));
> - free_bootmem_late(__pa(io_tlb_start),
> + free_bootmem_late(io_tlb_start,
> PAGE_ALIGN(io_tlb_nslabs << IO_TLB_SHIFT));
> }
> io_tlb_nslabs = 0;
> @@ -334,10 +337,8 @@ void __init swiotlb_free(void)
>
> static int is_swiotlb_buffer(phys_addr_t paddr)
> {
> - phys_addr_t swiotlb_start = virt_to_phys(io_tlb_start);
> -
> - return paddr >= swiotlb_start &&
> - paddr < (swiotlb_start + (io_tlb_nslabs << IO_TLB_SHIFT));
> + return paddr >= io_tlb_start &&
> + paddr < (io_tlb_start + (io_tlb_nslabs << IO_TLB_SHIFT));
> }
>
> /*
> @@ -450,7 +451,7 @@ void *swiotlb_tbl_map_single(struct device *hwdev, dma_addr_t tbl_dma_addr,
> io_tlb_list[i] = 0;
> for (i = index - 1; (OFFSET(i, IO_TLB_SEGSIZE) != IO_TLB_SEGSIZE - 1) && io_tlb_list[i]; i--)
> io_tlb_list[i] = ++count;
> - dma_addr = io_tlb_start + (index << IO_TLB_SHIFT);
> + dma_addr = (char *)phys_to_virt(io_tlb_start) + (index << IO_TLB_SHIFT);
I think this is going to fall flat with the other user of
swiotlb_tbl_map_single - Xen SWIOTLB. When it allocates the io_tlb_start
and does it magic to make sure its under 4GB - the io_tlb_start swath
of memory, ends up consisting of 2MB chunks of contingous spaces. But each
chunk is not linearly in the DMA space (thought it is in the CPU space).
Meaning the io_tlb_start region 0-2MB can fall within the DMA address space
of 2048MB->2032MB, and io_tlb_start offset 2MB->4MB, can fall within 1024MB->1026MB,
and so on (depending on the availability of memory under 4GB).
There is a clear virt_to_phys(x) != virt_to_dma(x).
>
> /*
> * Update the indices to avoid searching in the next
> @@ -494,7 +495,7 @@ static void *
> map_single(struct device *hwdev, phys_addr_t phys, size_t size,
> enum dma_data_direction dir)
> {
> - dma_addr_t start_dma_addr = swiotlb_virt_to_bus(hwdev, io_tlb_start);
> + dma_addr_t start_dma_addr = phys_to_dma(hwdev, io_tlb_start);
>
> return swiotlb_tbl_map_single(hwdev, start_dma_addr, phys, size, dir);
> }
> @@ -508,7 +509,7 @@ swiotlb_tbl_unmap_single(struct device *hwdev, char *dma_addr, size_t size,
> {
> unsigned long flags;
> int i, count, nslots = ALIGN(size, 1 << IO_TLB_SHIFT) >> IO_TLB_SHIFT;
> - int index = (dma_addr - io_tlb_start) >> IO_TLB_SHIFT;
> + int index = (dma_addr - (char *)phys_to_virt(io_tlb_start)) >> IO_TLB_SHIFT;
Ditto with explanation above. This I think will cause issues.
> phys_addr_t phys = io_tlb_orig_addr[index];
>
> /*
> @@ -549,7 +550,7 @@ swiotlb_tbl_sync_single(struct device *hwdev, char *dma_addr, size_t size,
> enum dma_data_direction dir,
> enum dma_sync_target target)
> {
> - int index = (dma_addr - io_tlb_start) >> IO_TLB_SHIFT;
> + int index = (dma_addr - (char *)phys_to_virt(io_tlb_start)) >> IO_TLB_SHIFT;
> phys_addr_t phys = io_tlb_orig_addr[index];
>
> phys += ((unsigned long)dma_addr & ((1 << IO_TLB_SHIFT) - 1));
> @@ -937,6 +938,6 @@ swiotlb_dma_supported(struct device *hwdev, u64 mask)
> {
> unsigned long bytes = io_tlb_nslabs << IO_TLB_SHIFT;
>
> - return swiotlb_virt_to_bus(hwdev, io_tlb_start + bytes - 1) <= mask;
> + return phys_to_dma(hwdev, io_tlb_start + bytes - 1) <= mask;
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(swiotlb_dma_supported);
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists