linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/3] virtio-net: inline header support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <87bogj2j1b.fsf@rustcorp.com.au>
Date:	Thu, 04 Oct 2012 09:41:12 +0930
From:	Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
To:	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
Cc:	"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
	Thomas Lendacky <tahm@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org, avi@...hat.com,
	Sasha Levin <levinsasha928@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] virtio-net: inline header support

Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com> writes:

> Il 03/10/2012 08:44, Rusty Russell ha scritto:
>> There's a reason I haven't done this.  I really, really dislike "my
>> implemention isn't broken" feature bits.  We could have an infinite
>> number of them, for each bug in each device.
>
> However, this bug affects (almost) all implementations and (almost) all
> devices.  It even makes sense to reserve a transport feature bit for it
> instead of a device feature bit.
>
> Paolo

Perhaps, but we have to fix the bugs first!

As I said, my torture patch broke qemu immediately.  Since noone has
leapt onto fixing that, I'll take a look now...

Cheers,
Rusty.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/