linux-kernel - Re: [qla2xxx] INFO: possible irq lock inversion dependency detected

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <506DAE41.6040007@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date:	Thu, 04 Oct 2012 21:11:53 +0530
From:	"Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:	Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>
CC:	linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, James.Bottomley@...senpartnership.com,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Nicholas Bellinger <nab@...ux-iscsi.org>
Subject: Re: [qla2xxx] INFO: possible irq lock inversion dependency detected

Hi Jiri,

Thanks for taking a look!
 
> This seems to be real. You should be seeing that since 3.5-rc1 already 
> though ... ?
> 
> Does the patch below fix that?
> 

Yes, it does, thanks! But 3.6-rc kernels were booting fine as far as I remember.
I'll check again and get back tomorrow.

> 
> From: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>
> Subject: [PATCH] [SCSI] qla2xxx: fix potential deadlock on ha->hardware_lock
> 
> Lockdep reports:
> 
> === [ cut here ] ===
>  =========================================================
>  [ INFO: possible irq lock inversion dependency detected ]
>  3.6.0-0.0.0.28.36b5ec9-default #1 Not tainted
>  ---------------------------------------------------------
>  qla2xxx_1_dpc/368 just changed the state of lock:
>   (&(&ha->vport_slock)->rlock){+.....}, at: [<ffffffffa009b377>] qla2x00_configure_hba+0x197/0x3c0 [qla2xxx]
>  but this lock was taken by another, HARDIRQ-safe lock in the past:
>   (&(&ha->hardware_lock)->rlock){-.....}
> 
> and interrupts could create inverse lock ordering between them.
> 
> other info that might help us debug this:
>  Possible interrupt unsafe locking scenario:
> 
>        CPU0                    CPU1
>        ----                    ----
>   lock(&(&ha->vport_slock)->rlock);
>                                local_irq_disable();
>                                lock(&(&ha->hardware_lock)->rlock);
>                                lock(&(&ha->vport_slock)->rlock);
>   <Interrupt>
>     lock(&(&ha->hardware_lock)->rlock);
> === [ cut here ] ===
> 
> Fix the potential deadlock by disabling IRQs while holding ha->vport_slock.
> 
> Reported-by: Srivatsa S. Bhat <srivatsa.bhat@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>

Tested-by: Srivatsa S. Bhat <srivatsa.bhat@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>

Regards,
Srivatsa S. Bhat

> ---
>  drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/qla_init.c |    5 +++--
>  1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/qla_init.c b/drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/qla_init.c
> index 799a58b..48fca47 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/qla_init.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/qla_init.c
> @@ -2080,6 +2080,7 @@ qla2x00_configure_hba(scsi_qla_host_t *vha)
>  	uint8_t       domain;
>  	char		connect_type[22];
>  	struct qla_hw_data *ha = vha->hw;
> +	unsigned long flags;
> 
>  	/* Get host addresses. */
>  	rval = qla2x00_get_adapter_id(vha,
> @@ -2154,9 +2155,9 @@ qla2x00_configure_hba(scsi_qla_host_t *vha)
>  	vha->d_id.b.area = area;
>  	vha->d_id.b.al_pa = al_pa;
> 
> -	spin_lock(&ha->vport_slock);
> +	spin_lock_irqsave(&ha->vport_slock, flags);
>  	qlt_update_vp_map(vha, SET_AL_PA);
> -	spin_unlock(&ha->vport_slock);
> +	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ha->vport_slock, flags);
> 
>  	if (!vha->flags.init_done)
>  		ql_log(ql_log_info, vha, 0x2010,
> 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/