[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20121004174626.GB14301@kroah.com>
Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2012 10:46:26 -0700
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Huacai Chen <chenhc@...ote.com>,
Charles Wang <muming.wq@...bao.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Seems like "sched: Add missing call to calc_load_exit_idle()"
should be reverted in 3.5 branch
On Thu, Oct 04, 2012 at 12:11:01PM +0800, Huacai Chen wrote:
> Hi, Greg
>
> I found that Linux-3.5.5 accept this commit "sched: Add missing call
> to calc_load_exit_idle()" but I think this isn't needed. Because
> "5167e8d5417b sched/nohz: Rewrite and fix load-avg computation --
> again not fully applied" is true for 3.6 branch, but not for 3.5
> branch.
But 5167e8d5417b is in 3.5, so shouldn't this commit still be necessary?
> In 3.5 branch, calc_load_exit_idle() is already called in
> tick_nohz_idle_exit(), it doesn't need to be called at
> tick_nohz_update_jiffies() again. In 3.6 branch, some code of
> tick_nohz_idle_exit() is splitted to tick_nohz_restart_sched_tick()
> and calc_load_exit_idle() is missing by accident, so commit "sched:
> Add missing call to calc_load_exit_idle()" is needed.
So this really should be dropped from 3.5? Charles, Peter, Ingo, any
thoughts here?
thanks,
greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists