[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20121003.214750.2022020970468412510.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Wed, 03 Oct 2012 21:47:50 -0400 (EDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: sfr@...b.auug.org.au
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-next@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, vipul@...lsio.com, jay@...lsio.com
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the net tree
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2012 11:06:15 +1000
> Actually, for me it is. I have a script that does the "use yesterday's
> version" for me. To fix (even a one liner) means bringing up an editor,
> commiting, creating the patch and then recommiting it (an implementation
> detail) and recording that I need to keep (automatically) applying the
> patch in case the maintainer doesn't react quickly.
Ok, fair enough.
I'll try to look into making x86 barf when a vmalloc.h include is
missing.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists