[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20121003.220027.1636081487098835868.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Wed, 03 Oct 2012 22:00:27 -0400 (EDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org, sparclinux@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
aarcange@...hat.com, hannes@...xchg.org, gerald.schaefer@...ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8] THP support for Sparc64
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2012 15:55:44 -0700
> I had a shot at integrating all this onto the pending stuff in linux-next.
> "mm: Add and use update_mmu_cache_pmd() in transparent huge page code."
> needed minor massaging in huge_memory.c. But as Andrea mentioned, we
> ran aground on Gerald's
> http://ozlabs.org/~akpm/mmotm/broken-out/thp-remove-assumptions-on-pgtable_t-type.patch,
> part of the thp-for-s390 work.
While working on a rebase relative to this work, I noticed that the
s390 patches don't even compile.
It's because of that pmd_pgprot() change from Peter Z. which arrives
asynchonously via the linux-next tree. It makes THP start using
pmd_pgprot() (a new interface) which the s390 patches don't provide.
It's going to require that I do new work for my sparc64 THP changes as
well.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists