[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <506DE1F4.9090309@codeaurora.org>
Date: Thu, 04 Oct 2012 12:22:28 -0700
From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>
To: Rob Herring <robherring2@...il.com>
CC: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@...sung.com>,
Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
Srinidhi Kasagar <srinidhi.kasagar@...ricsson.com>,
Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Shiraz Hashim <shiraz.hashim@...com>,
Simon Horman <horms@...ge.net.au>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.linux@...il.com>,
Sascha Hauer <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
David Brown <davidb@...eaurora.org>,
Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: Push selects for TWD/SCU into machine entries
On 10/04/12 06:05, Rob Herring wrote:
> On 10/04/2012 03:50 AM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
>> The TWD and SCU configs are selected by default as long as
>> SCORPIONMP is false and/or MCT is false. Implementing the logic
>> this way certainly saves lines in the Kconfig but it precludes
>> those machines which select SCORPIONMP or MCT from participating
>> in the single zImage effort because when those machines are
>> combined with other SMP capable machines the TWD and SCU are no
>> longer selected.
>>
>> Push the select out to the machine entries so that we can compile
>> these machines together and still select the appropriate configs.
> I think this is the wrong direction as I'd like to see the platform
> selects shrink. I believe the local timers are run-time enabled now, so
> can't we just drop the condition and always select TWD and SCU for
> multi-platform?
That sounds fine for multi-platform but it penalizes the "optimized"
images made for a particular device that doesn't want any extra code
than is necessary. Isn't this why we have the Kconfig language?
>
> Or perhaps we need a CortexA9 config symbol that selects V7, GIC, TWD,
> SCU, SMP, PL310, errata, etc. rather than duplicating those for every
> platform.
>
>
This sounds like a good consolidation of lines that can be done in
parallel to this patch. Care to send a patch on top?
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
hosted by The Linux Foundation
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists