[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAE9FiQWjXhat85JpXhCLApGe62mdCwb2HKhWGLjQdj2ed=6buA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2012 14:21:44 -0700
From: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
To: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>
Cc: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@...citrix.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Jacob Shin <jacob.shin@....com>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/13] x86, mm: Revert back good_end setting for 64bit
On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 9:45 AM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
<konrad.wilk@...cle.com> wrote:
>> So could use ram under 1M to map that page table at first.
>
> Could or does this patch do it? And why 1MB?
can you or stefano could test attached patch on xen ?
that will map the page table buffer that will be used.
under 1M, still 4k there, so there will be no page table around 512M.
>>
>> so that will make it xen happy ?
>
> The issues that Xen faces are purely due to the fact that they
> must be RO when they are in use. I believe (and without actually
> checking it just to make sure) that it does not matter where
> the page-tables are located. But with the current generic code
> the location is quite linear: it starts with pgt_buf_start and
> goes up to pgt_buf_top. So how would this patch move the location
> of the page-table to be under 1MB?
just page table buf's page table.
Thanks
Yinghai
Download attachment "fix_xen_with_init_mapping.patch" of type "application/octet-stream" (2263 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists