lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Thu,  4 Oct 2012 14:21:11 -0700
From:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk,
	Guillaume Jaunet <guillaume.jaunet@...ricsson.com>,
	Christophe Arnal <christophe.arnal@...ricsson.com>,
	Matthias Locher <matthias.locher@...ricsson.com>,
	Rajanikanth HV <rajanikanth.hv@...ricsson.com>,
	Bibek Basu <bibek.basu@...ricsson.com>,
	Par-Gunnar Hjalmdahl <par-gunnar.hjalmdahl@...ricsson.com>,
	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Subject: [ 20/52] serial: pl011: handle corruption at high clock speeds

3.4-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>

commit c5dd553b9fd069892c9e2de734f4f604e280fa7a upstream.

This works around a few glitches in the ST version of the PL011
serial driver when using very high baud rates, as we do in the
Ux500: 3, 3.25, 4 and 4.05 Mbps.

Problem Observed/rootcause:

When using high baud-rates, and the baudrate*8 is getting close to
the provided clock frequency (so a division factor close to 1), when
using bursts of characters (so they are abutted), then it seems as if
there is not enough time to detect the beginning of the start-bit which
is a timing reference for the entire character, and thus the sampling
moment of character bits is moving towards the end of each bit, instead
of the middle.

Fix:
Increase slightly the RX baud rate of the UART above the theoretical
baudrate by 5%. This will definitely give more margin time to the
UART_RX to correctly sample the data at the middle of the bit period.

Also fix the ages old copy-paste error in the very stressed comment,
it's referencing the registers used in the PL010 driver rather than
the PL011 ones.

Signed-off-by: Guillaume Jaunet <guillaume.jaunet@...ricsson.com>
Signed-off-by: Christophe Arnal <christophe.arnal@...ricsson.com>
Signed-off-by: Matthias Locher <matthias.locher@...ricsson.com>
Signed-off-by: Rajanikanth HV <rajanikanth.hv@...ricsson.com>
Cc: Bibek Basu <bibek.basu@...ricsson.com>
Cc: Par-Gunnar Hjalmdahl <par-gunnar.hjalmdahl@...ricsson.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>

---
 drivers/tty/serial/amba-pl011.c |   15 ++++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/drivers/tty/serial/amba-pl011.c
+++ b/drivers/tty/serial/amba-pl011.c
@@ -1654,13 +1654,26 @@ pl011_set_termios(struct uart_port *port
 			old_cr &= ~ST_UART011_CR_OVSFACT;
 	}
 
+	/*
+	 * Workaround for the ST Micro oversampling variants to
+	 * increase the bitrate slightly, by lowering the divisor,
+	 * to avoid delayed sampling of start bit at high speeds,
+	 * else we see data corruption.
+	 */
+	if (uap->vendor->oversampling) {
+		if ((baud >= 3000000) && (baud < 3250000) && (quot > 1))
+			quot -= 1;
+		else if ((baud > 3250000) && (quot > 2))
+			quot -= 2;
+	}
 	/* Set baud rate */
 	writew(quot & 0x3f, port->membase + UART011_FBRD);
 	writew(quot >> 6, port->membase + UART011_IBRD);
 
 	/*
 	 * ----------v----------v----------v----------v-----
-	 * NOTE: MUST BE WRITTEN AFTER UARTLCR_M & UARTLCR_L
+	 * NOTE: lcrh_tx and lcrh_rx MUST BE WRITTEN AFTER
+	 * UART011_FBRD & UART011_IBRD.
 	 * ----------^----------^----------^----------^-----
 	 */
 	writew(lcr_h, port->membase + uap->lcrh_rx);


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ