linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 04/13] x86, mm: Revert back good

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <506E029E.3000102@zytor.com>
Date:	Thu, 04 Oct 2012 14:41:50 -0700
From:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To:	Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
CC:	Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>,
	Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@...citrix.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Jacob Shin <jacob.shin@....com>,
	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/13] x86, mm: Revert back good_end setting for 64bit

On 10/04/2012 02:40 PM, Yinghai Lu wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 2:21 PM, Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org> wrote:
>> On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 9:45 AM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
>> <konrad.wilk@...cle.com> wrote:
>>>> So could use ram under 1M to map that page table at first.
>>>
>>> Could or does this patch do it? And why 1MB?
>>
>> can you or stefano could test attached patch on xen ?
>>
> on top of
> 
> http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/tip/tip.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/x86/mm2
> 
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip.git  x86/mm2
> 

No, no, not yet another ad hoc hack... please.

	-hpa


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/