[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1210041450530.11776@chino.kir.corp.google.com>
Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2012 14:51:54 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
To: Daniel Santos <daniel.santos@...ox.com>
cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Christopher Li <sparse@...isli.org>,
David Daney <david.daney@...ium.com>,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>,
Konstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@...nvz.org>,
linux-sparse@...r.kernel.org,
Michel Lespinasse <walken@...gle.com>,
Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@...driver.com>,
Pavel Pisa <pisa@....felk.cvut.cz>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/10] bug.h: Replace __linktime_error with
__compiletime_error
On Wed, 3 Oct 2012, Daniel Santos wrote:
> I have it checked out from git://git.cmpxchg.org/linux-mmotm.git, the
> problem is that I cannot correctly test against that right now because I
> get an oops (without my patches) when setting up LVM (same on -next, bug
> report here https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=48241). What
> I'm thinking about doing is to rebase them against v3.6 again and test
> them there, but it will require a few minor changes (due to walken's
> patches not being present). Still, it's better than no re-testing.
> Daniel
>
I would cherry-pick the changes you already have for this patchset in -mm
into Linus' latest tree, then base your new patchset on top of that
modified tree.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists