[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20121005095945.GC29125@suse.de>
Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2012 10:59:45 +0100
From: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>,
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...onic-design.de>,
Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
Michal Nazarewicz <mina86@...a86.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>,
Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@...sung.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>,
Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@...com>
Subject: [PATCH] mm: compaction: Iron out isolate_freepages_block() and
isolate_freepages_range() -fix2
Thierry reported offline that the strict check "mm: compaction: Iron out
isolate_freepages_block() and isolate_freepages_range() -fix1" check is
still too strict because it's possible for more pages to be isolated
than required. This patch corrects the check.
There are still CMA-related problems but they are "somewhere else" yet
to be determined.
Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>
---
mm/compaction.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/mm/compaction.c b/mm/compaction.c
index 2c4ce17..9eef558 100644
--- a/mm/compaction.c
+++ b/mm/compaction.c
@@ -346,7 +346,7 @@ static unsigned long isolate_freepages_block(struct compact_control *cc,
* pages requested were isolated. If there were any failures, 0 is
* returned and CMA will fail.
*/
- if (strict && nr_strict_required != total_isolated)
+ if (strict && nr_strict_required > total_isolated)
total_isolated = 0;
if (locked)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists