[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <tip-kxyjqpfj2fn9gt7kwu5ag9ks@git.kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2012 06:04:41 -0700
From: tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
To: linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, eranian@...gle.com, hpa@...or.com,
mingo@...nel.org, a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl, tglx@...utronix.de
Subject: [tip:perf/urgent] perf: Clarify perf_cpu_context::
active_pmu usage by renaming it to ::unique_pmu
Commit-ID: 3f1f33206c16c7b3839d71372bc2ac3f305aa802
Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/3f1f33206c16c7b3839d71372bc2ac3f305aa802
Author: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
AuthorDate: Tue, 2 Oct 2012 15:38:52 +0200
Committer: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
CommitDate: Fri, 5 Oct 2012 13:59:06 +0200
perf: Clarify perf_cpu_context::active_pmu usage by renaming it to ::unique_pmu
Stephane thought the perf_cpu_context::active_pmu name confusing and
suggested using 'unique_pmu' instead.
This pointer is a pointer to a 'random' pmu sharing the cpuctx
instance, therefore limiting a for_each_pmu loop to those where
cpuctx->unique_pmu matches the pmu we get a loop over unique cpuctx
instances.
Suggested-by: Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/n/tip-kxyjqpfj2fn9gt7kwu5ag9ks@git.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
---
include/linux/perf_event.h | 2 +-
kernel/events/core.c | 12 ++++++------
2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/perf_event.h b/include/linux/perf_event.h
index 599afc4..b4166cd 100644
--- a/include/linux/perf_event.h
+++ b/include/linux/perf_event.h
@@ -1110,7 +1110,7 @@ struct perf_cpu_context {
int exclusive;
struct list_head rotation_list;
int jiffies_interval;
- struct pmu *active_pmu;
+ struct pmu *unique_pmu;
struct perf_cgroup *cgrp;
};
diff --git a/kernel/events/core.c b/kernel/events/core.c
index 7b9df35..81939e8 100644
--- a/kernel/events/core.c
+++ b/kernel/events/core.c
@@ -4419,7 +4419,7 @@ static void perf_event_task_event(struct perf_task_event *task_event)
rcu_read_lock();
list_for_each_entry_rcu(pmu, &pmus, entry) {
cpuctx = get_cpu_ptr(pmu->pmu_cpu_context);
- if (cpuctx->active_pmu != pmu)
+ if (cpuctx->unique_pmu != pmu)
goto next;
perf_event_task_ctx(&cpuctx->ctx, task_event);
@@ -4565,7 +4565,7 @@ static void perf_event_comm_event(struct perf_comm_event *comm_event)
rcu_read_lock();
list_for_each_entry_rcu(pmu, &pmus, entry) {
cpuctx = get_cpu_ptr(pmu->pmu_cpu_context);
- if (cpuctx->active_pmu != pmu)
+ if (cpuctx->unique_pmu != pmu)
goto next;
perf_event_comm_ctx(&cpuctx->ctx, comm_event);
@@ -4761,7 +4761,7 @@ got_name:
rcu_read_lock();
list_for_each_entry_rcu(pmu, &pmus, entry) {
cpuctx = get_cpu_ptr(pmu->pmu_cpu_context);
- if (cpuctx->active_pmu != pmu)
+ if (cpuctx->unique_pmu != pmu)
goto next;
perf_event_mmap_ctx(&cpuctx->ctx, mmap_event,
vma->vm_flags & VM_EXEC);
@@ -5862,8 +5862,8 @@ static void update_pmu_context(struct pmu *pmu, struct pmu *old_pmu)
cpuctx = per_cpu_ptr(pmu->pmu_cpu_context, cpu);
- if (cpuctx->active_pmu == old_pmu)
- cpuctx->active_pmu = pmu;
+ if (cpuctx->unique_pmu == old_pmu)
+ cpuctx->unique_pmu = pmu;
}
}
@@ -5998,7 +5998,7 @@ skip_type:
cpuctx->ctx.pmu = pmu;
cpuctx->jiffies_interval = 1;
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&cpuctx->rotation_list);
- cpuctx->active_pmu = pmu;
+ cpuctx->unique_pmu = pmu;
}
got_cpu_context:
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists