[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <506E9CDC020000780009FD13@nat28.tlf.novell.com>
Date: Fri, 05 Oct 2012 07:39:56 +0100
From: "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@...e.com>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Cc: <matt@...sole-pimps.org>, <matt.fleming@...el.com>,
<mingo@...nel.org>, <x86@...nel.org>, <mjg@...hat.com>,
<linux-efi@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] x86, mm: Include the entire kernel memory map
in trampoline_pgd
>>> On 04.10.12 at 23:08, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com> wrote:
> On 10/03/2012 06:31 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>>> Matt Fleming <matt@...sole-pimps.org> 10/03/12 2:59 PM >>>
>>> +static int insert_identity_mapping(resource_size_t paddr, unsigned long
> vaddr,
>>> + unsigned long size)
>>> +{
>>> + unsigned long end = vaddr + size;
>>> + unsigned long next;
>>> + pgd_t *vpgd, *ppgd;
>>> +
>>> +#ifdef CONFIG_X86_32
>>> + ppgd = initial_page_table + pgd_index(paddr);
>>> +
>>> + if (paddr >= PAGE_OFFSET || paddr + size > PAGE_OFFSET)
>>> + return 1;
>>> +#else
>>> + ppgd = __va(real_mode_header->trampoline_pgd) + pgd_index(paddr);
>>
>> Missing equivalent code (to the 32-bit one above) here - after all, you're
> trying
>> to potentially insert a 52-bit physical address into 48-bit virtual space.
>>
>
> We should have the check, but at least for Linux support we require
> P <= V-2.
Not really imo - P <= V - 1 should be sufficient here, as all that is
necessary is that the result represents a 1:1 mapping. Specifically,
there's no constraint to the virtual space limitation of the direct
mapping of RAM.
Jan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists