[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <506F0A90.7020106@zytor.com>
Date: Fri, 05 Oct 2012 09:28:00 -0700
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@...e.com>
CC: matt@...sole-pimps.org, matt.fleming@...el.com, mingo@...nel.org,
x86@...nel.org, mjg@...hat.com, linux-efi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] x86, mm: Include the entire kernel memory map in
trampoline_pgd
On 10/04/2012 11:39 PM, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>
>> We should have the check, but at least for Linux support we require
>> P <= V-2.
>
> Not really imo - P <= V - 1 should be sufficient here, as all that is
> necessary is that the result represents a 1:1 mapping. Specifically,
> there's no constraint to the virtual space limitation of the direct
> mapping of RAM.
>
The P <= V-2 limitation doesn't come from this, it comes from the fact
that we need to have the regular kernel 1:1 map and still have space for
the kernel, vmalloc, ioremap and so on in the kernel part of the address
space; in theory it *could* be some fraction between 1 and 2, but since
hardware doesn't do fractional bits very well the above is what we have
been telling the hardware folks. :)
-hpa
--
H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center
I work for Intel. I don't speak on their behalf.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists