lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 05 Oct 2012 11:17:11 +0930 From: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au> To: Kasatkin@...abs.org, Dmitry <dmitry.kasatkin@...el.com> Cc: "Kees Cook" <keescook@...omium.org>, "David Howells" <dhowells@...hat.com>, "LKML" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "Mimi Zohar" <zohar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> Subject: Module xattr signatures Hi all, Had a talk with Mimi, and IMA still wants xattr signatures on modules like they have for other files with EVM. With Kees' patches now merged into my modules-wip branch (warning, rebases frequently), this should be pretty simple. Dmitry? The question of whether this falls back to appended signatures if there's no xattr support, or whether we fix cpio depends on whether someone is prepared to do the latter. As Mimi points out, AIX, bsd, solaris all have versions of cpio that support extended attributes, as does the bsdcpio Debian package, for example. Thanks, Rusty. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists