[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHGf_=qn4m6x95h5uV6jXibc0RmTH-1ZC17vSUTyTTXktfd23g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2012 14:39:22 -0400
From: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
To: Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@...fujitsu.com>
Cc: wency@...fujitsu.com, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, rientjes@...gle.com,
liuj97@...il.com, len.brown@...el.com, benh@...nel.crashing.org,
paulus@...ba.org, minchan.kim@...il.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] memory-hotplug: add node_device_release
> I have the reason to have to fill the node struct with 0 by memset.
> The node is a part of node struct array (node_devices[]).
> If we add empty release function for suppressing warning,
> some data remains in the node struct after hot removing memory.
> So if we re-hot adds the memory, the node struct is reused by
> register_onde_node(). But the node struct has some data, because
> it was not initialized with 0. As a result, more waning is shown
> by the remained data at hot addinig memory as follows:
Even though you call memset(0) at offline. It doesn't guarantee the memory
keep 0 until online. E.g. physical memory exchange during offline, bit
corruption
by cosmic ray, etc. So, you should fill zero at online phase explicitly if need.
The basic hotplug design is: you should forget everything at offline
and you shouldn't
assume any initialized data at online.
Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists