linux-kernel - [PATCH 3/20 V2] drivers/net/can/sja1000/peak

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1349469667-6137-3-git-send-email-peter.senna@gmail.com>
Date:	Fri,  5 Oct 2012 22:41:05 +0200
From:	Peter Senna Tschudin <peter.senna@...il.com>
To:	wg@...ndegger.com
Cc:	mkl@...gutronix.de, davem@...emloft.net, jj@...osbits.net,
	linux-can@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
	Peter Senna Tschudin <peter.senna@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH 3/20 V2] drivers/net/can/sja1000/peak_pci.c: fix error return code

From: Peter Senna Tschudin <peter.senna@...il.com>

The function peak_pci_probe() return 0 for success and negative value
for most of its internal tests failures. There are two exceptions
that are error cases going to failure_*:. Fore this two cases the
function abort its success execution path, but returns non negative
value, making it dificult for a caller function to notice the error.

This patch fixes the error cases that do not return negative values.

This was found by Coccinelle, but the code change was made by hand.
This patch is not robot generated.

A simplified version of the semantic match that finds this problem is
as follows: (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/)

// <smpl>
(
if@p1 (\(ret < 0\|ret != 0\))
 { ... return ret; }
|
ret@p1 = 0
)
... when != ret = e1
    when != &ret
*if(...)
{
  ... when != ret = e2
      when forall
 return ret;
}
// </smpl>

Signed-off-by: Peter Senna Tschudin <peter.senna@...il.com>

---
Change from V1:
	Updated commit message. See: 
	http://www.kernelhub.org/?p=2&msg=139319

 drivers/net/can/sja1000/peak_pci.c |    2 ++
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/net/can/sja1000/peak_pci.c b/drivers/net/can/sja1000/peak_pci.c
index f0a1296..f5b82ae 100644
--- a/drivers/net/can/sja1000/peak_pci.c
+++ b/drivers/net/can/sja1000/peak_pci.c
@@ -583,12 +583,14 @@ static int __devinit peak_pci_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev,
 	cfg_base = pci_iomap(pdev, 0, PEAK_PCI_CFG_SIZE);
 	if (!cfg_base) {
 		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to map PCI resource #0\n");
+		err = -ENOMEM;
 		goto failure_release_regions;
 	}
 
 	reg_base = pci_iomap(pdev, 1, PEAK_PCI_CHAN_SIZE * channels);
 	if (!reg_base) {
 		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to map PCI resource #1\n");
+		err = -ENOMEM;
 		goto failure_unmap_cfg_base;
 	}
 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/