linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 09/10] bug.h: Add BUILD_BUG_ON_MSG & BUILD_BUG

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1349471048.6755.77.camel@gandalf.local.home>
Date:	Fri, 05 Oct 2012 17:04:08 -0400
From:	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To:	Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Cc:	danielfsantos@....net, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
	Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Christopher Li <sparse@...isli.org>,
	David Daney <david.daney@...ium.com>,
	David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
	David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
	Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>,
	Konstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@...nvz.org>,
	linux-sparse@...r.kernel.org,
	Michel Lespinasse <walken@...gle.com>,
	Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@...driver.com>,
	Pavel Pisa <pisa@....felk.cvut.cz>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
	Daniel Santos <daniel.santos@...ox.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 09/10] bug.h: Add BUILD_BUG_ON_MSG &
 BUILD_BUG_INTERNAL{,2}

On Fri, 2012-10-05 at 22:58 +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 05, 2012 at 02:42:48PM -0500, danielfsantos@....net wrote:
> > Add BUILD_BUG_ON_MSG which behaves like BUILD_BUG_ON (with optimizations
> > turned enabled), except that it allows you to specify the error message
> > you want emitted as the third parameter.  Under the hood, this relies on
> > BUILD_BUG_INTERNAL{,2}, which does the actual work and is pretty-much
> > identical to BUILD_BUG_ON.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Daniel Santos <daniel.santos@...ox.com>
> > ---
> >  include/linux/bug.h |   26 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  1 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/include/linux/bug.h b/include/linux/bug.h
> > index 1b43ea2..91bd9d5 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/bug.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/bug.h
> > @@ -16,6 +16,7 @@ struct pt_regs;
> >  #define BUILD_BUG_ON_NOT_POWER_OF_2(n)
> >  #define BUILD_BUG_ON_ZERO(e) (0)
> >  #define BUILD_BUG_ON_NULL(e) ((void*)0)
> > +#define BUILD_BUG_ON_MSG(cond, msg) (0)
> >  #define BUILD_BUG_ON(condition) (0)
> >  #define BUILD_BUG() (0)
> >  #else /* __CHECKER__ */
> > @@ -38,6 +39,31 @@ struct pt_regs;
> >   */
> >  #define BUILD_BUG_ON_INVALID(e) ((void)(sizeof((__force long)(e))))
> >  
> > +#define _CONCAT1(a, b) a##b
> > +#define CONCAT(a, b) _CONCAT1(a, b)
> 
> Let's call the indirection _CONCAT without the "1".

You're stricter than I ;-)

> 
> > +#define UNIQUIFY(prefix) CONCAT(prefix, __LINE__)
> > +
> > +#define BUILD_BUG_INTERNAL2(condition, msg, fn)			\
> > +	do {							\
> > +		extern void fn (void) __compiletime_error(msg);	\
> > +		__compiletime_error_fallback(condition);	\
> > +		if (condition)					\
> > +			fn();					\
> > +	} while (0)
> > +
> > +#define BUILD_BUG_INTERNAL(condition, msg, fn) \
> > +	BUILD_BUG_INTERNAL2(condition, msg, fn)
> 
> Ditto. BUILD_BUG_INTERNAL2 should be __BUILD_BUG_INTERNAL and the one
> calling it _BUILD_BUG_INTERNAL (with one underscore).

I thought about commenting about the '2' too, but figured it's only used
internally by BUILD_BUG_INTERNAL and was really not too concerned about
such a trivial thing. It could have been 42 for all I care ;-)

> 
> > +
> > +/**
> > + * BUILD_BUG_ON_MSG - break compile if a condition is true & emit supplied
> > + * 		      error message.
> > + * @condition: the condition which the compiler should know is false.
> > + *
> > + * See BUILD_BUG_ON for description.
> > + */
> > +#define BUILD_BUG_ON_MSG(cond, msg) \
> > +	BUILD_BUG_INTERNAL(cond, msg, UNIQUIFY(__build_bug_on_failed_))
> 
> Btw, why are we adding the line at all? It is issued by gcc anyway:
> 
> cc -Wall    macros.c   -o macros
> macros.c: In function ‘main’:
> macros.c:22:1: error: ‘__build_bug_on_failed_22’ undeclared (first use in this function)
> 	^^^^
> 
> It is in front of the filename here.
> 
> macros.c:22:1: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in
> make: *** [macros] Error 1

I was thinking that the number was added as a safety measure that the
line number would be shown for all versions of the compiler. I'm not
sure it is.

-- Steve


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/