[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20121005143644.abb14c2b.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2012 14:36:44 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org, sparclinux@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
aarcange@...hat.com, hannes@...xchg.org,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/8] THP support for Sparc64
On Thu, 04 Oct 2012 15:46:24 -0400 (EDT)
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> wrote:
>
> Changes since V1:
>
> 1) Respun against mmotm
>
> 2) Bug fix for pgtable allocation, need real locking instead of
> just preemption disabling.
>
> Andrew, you can probably take patch #5 in this series and combine
> it into:
>
> mm-thp-fix-the-update_mmu_cache-last-argument-passing-in-mm-huge_memoryc.patch
>
> in your batch. And finally add a NOP implementation for S390
> and any other huge page supporting architectures.
>
David, I don't know what to do until there's some clarity on the
numa/sched changes. Andrea has a new autonuma patchset, Peter's code
is in -next and I don't know if it's planned for 3.7 merging. And I
suspect (hope) that it won't be merged if that is indeed planned.
Two days I asked what's going on and didn't get told. I put the entire
MM merge on hold yesterday and went off to do other things. At present
I plan to restage MM against mainline and send it all along to Linus on
Monday. If that happens and if you wish that the sparc changes be
merged for 3.7, I suggest that you rebase and retest on Tuesday and ask
Linus to pull it, with my ack.
Sorry.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists