linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 0/8] THP support for Sparc64

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20121005150036.edd3be21.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date:	Fri, 5 Oct 2012 15:00:36 -0700
From:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:	linux-mm@...ck.org, sparclinux@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
	aarcange@...hat.com, hannes@...xchg.org, mingo@...e.hu,
	a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/8] THP support for Sparc64

On Fri, 05 Oct 2012 17:45:08 -0400 (EDT)
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> wrote:

> From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
> Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2012 14:36:44 -0700
> 
> > David, I don't know what to do until there's some clarity on the
> > numa/sched changes.  Andrea has a new autonuma patchset, Peter's code
> > is in -next and I don't know if it's planned for 3.7 merging.  And I
> > suspect (hope) that it won't be merged if that is indeed planned.
> 
> It doesn't matter from a sparc64 perspective.
> 
> If you remove the autonuma patch, I'll still compile and work.
> I just provide an unused interface. 

ah, OK.

> Please do something instead of stalling these changes further.

OK, I'll add it all to the pile and will restage it against mainline on
Monday.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/