lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Sat, 06 Oct 2012 14:26:17 -0400 From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org> To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de> Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Seiji Aguchi <seiji.aguchi@....com>, "Thomas Gleixner (tglx@...utronix.de)" <tglx@...utronix.de>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "'mingo@...e.hu' (mingo@...e.hu)" <mingo@...e.hu>, "x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>, "dle-develop@...ts.sourceforge.net" <dle-develop@...ts.sourceforge.net>, Satoru Moriya <satoru.moriya@....com> Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] trace,x86: add x86 irq vector tracepoints On Sat, 2012-10-06 at 19:32 +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote: > > 2) Are the tracepoints done in a way that it's not going to cause "ABI" > > issues. If not then we need to redesign the tracepoints. > > Btw, this we should be asking ourselves about *all* TPs, especially if > they're in generic code. I agree, and I'm starting to think I shouldn't have given free reign over the TPs to system maintainers. That is, I should have pushed harder to understand all tracepoints added to code to make sure the maintainer knows that it can become an ABI. Some maintainers don't worry about it. But I can see it coming back to haunt them. In the end, it will hurt the maintainer of the code, which is why I gave the ownership of tracepoints to locations where they are at (instead of a "joint" ownership). But I probably should have been a TP cop for a while to allow them to understand the consequences first. -- Steve -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists