[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20121006215416.5fdbb6ef@endymion.delvare>
Date: Sat, 6 Oct 2012 21:54:16 +0200
From: Jean Delvare <khali@...ux-fr.org>
To: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
Cc: "benjamin.tissoires" <benjamin.tissoires@...il.com>,
Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>,
Stephane Chatty <chatty@...c.fr>, fabien.andre@...il.com,
scott.liu@....com.tw, Ben Dooks <ben-linux@...ff.org>,
Wolfram Sang <w.sang@...gutronix.de>,
linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org, linux-input@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] i2c-hid: introduce HID over i2c specification
implementation
On Wed, 3 Oct 2012 09:43:12 -0700, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 03:41:43PM +0200, benjamin.tissoires wrote:
> > + }
> > +
> > + do {
> > + ret = i2c_transfer(client->adapter, msg, msg_num);
> > + if (ret > 0)
> > + break;
> > + tries--;
> > + dev_dbg(&client->dev, "retrying i2chid_command:%d (%d)\n",
> > + command, tries);
> > + } while (tries > 0);
> > +
> > + if (wait && ret > 0) {
> > + if (debug)
> > + dev_err(&client->dev, "%s: waiting....\n", __func__);
> > + if (!wait_event_timeout(ihid->wait,
> > + !test_bit(I2C_HID_RESET_PENDING, &ihid->flags),
> > + msecs_to_jiffies(5000)))
> > + ret = -ENODATA;
> > + if (debug)
> > + dev_err(&client->dev, "%s: finished.\n", __func__);
>
> Why do we have error level messages with debug? I know dev_dbg is
> compiled out if !DEBUG, but there must be a better way. Maybe define
> i2c_hid_dbg() via dev_printk() and also check debug condition there?
dev_dbg() is compiled out if !DEBUG only if CONFIG_DYNAMIC_DEBUG isn't
set. These days I think every developer want to enable this option.
--
Jean Delvare
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists