[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <m2zk40v4qy.fsf@firstfloor.org>
Date: Fri, 05 Oct 2012 17:11:33 -0700
From: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
To: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <pzijlstr@...hat.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Hillf Danton <dhillf@...il.com>,
Andrew Jones <drjones@...hat.com>,
Dan Smith <danms@...ibm.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Paul Turner <pjt@...gle.com>, Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>,
Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com>,
Bharata B Rao <bharata.rao@...il.com>,
Lee Schermerhorn <Lee.Schermerhorn@...com>,
Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Alex@...ux.intel.com, Sh@...ux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/33] AutoNUMA27
Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com> writes:
>>
>
> I remembered that 3 months ago when Alex tested the numa/sched patches
> there were 20% regression on SpecJbb2005 due to the numa balancer.
20% on anything sounds like a show stopper to me.
-Andi
--
ak@...ux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists