[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5071AEF3.6080108@bfs.de>
Date: Sun, 07 Oct 2012 18:33:55 +0200
From: walter harms <wharms@....de>
To: Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@...6.fr>
CC: Antti Palosaari <crope@....fi>, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
rmallon@...il.com, shubhrajyoti@...com,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...radead.org>,
linux-media@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 13/13] drivers/media/tuners/e4000.c: use macros for i2c_msg
initialization
Am 07.10.2012 17:38, schrieb Julia Lawall:
> From: Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@...6.fr>
>
> Introduce use of I2c_MSG_READ/WRITE/OP, for readability.
>
> In the second i2c_msg structure, a length expressed as an explicit constant
> is also re-expressed as the size of the buffer, reg.
>
> A simplified version of the semantic patch that makes this change is as
> follows: (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/)
>
> // <smpl>
> @@
> expression a,b,c;
> identifier x;
> @@
>
> struct i2c_msg x =
> - {.addr = a, .buf = b, .len = c, .flags = I2C_M_RD}
> + I2C_MSG_READ(a,b,c)
> ;
>
> @@
> expression a,b,c;
> identifier x;
> @@
>
> struct i2c_msg x =
> - {.addr = a, .buf = b, .len = c, .flags = 0}
> + I2C_MSG_WRITE(a,b,c)
> ;
>
> @@
> expression a,b,c,d;
> identifier x;
> @@
>
> struct i2c_msg x =
> - {.addr = a, .buf = b, .len = c, .flags = d}
> + I2C_MSG_OP(a,b,c,d)
> ;
> // </smpl>
>
> Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@...6.fr>
>
> ---
> drivers/media/tuners/e4000.c | 20 +++-----------------
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/media/tuners/e4000.c b/drivers/media/tuners/e4000.c
> index 1b33ed3..8f182fc 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/tuners/e4000.c
> +++ b/drivers/media/tuners/e4000.c
> @@ -26,12 +26,7 @@ static int e4000_wr_regs(struct e4000_priv *priv, u8 reg, u8 *val, int len)
> int ret;
> u8 buf[1 + len];
> struct i2c_msg msg[1] = {
> - {
> - .addr = priv->cfg->i2c_addr,
> - .flags = 0,
> - .len = sizeof(buf),
> - .buf = buf,
> - }
> + I2C_MSG_WRITE(priv->cfg->i2c_addr, buf, sizeof(buf))
> };
>
Any reason why struct i2c_msg is an array ?
re,
wh
> buf[0] = reg;
> @@ -54,17 +49,8 @@ static int e4000_rd_regs(struct e4000_priv *priv, u8 reg, u8 *val, int len)
> int ret;
> u8 buf[len];
> struct i2c_msg msg[2] = {
> - {
> - .addr = priv->cfg->i2c_addr,
> - .flags = 0,
> - .len = 1,
> - .buf = ®,
> - }, {
> - .addr = priv->cfg->i2c_addr,
> - .flags = I2C_M_RD,
> - .len = sizeof(buf),
> - .buf = buf,
> - }
> + I2C_MSG_WRITE(priv->cfg->i2c_addr, ®, sizeof(reg)),
> + I2C_MSG_READ(priv->cfg->i2c_addr, buf, sizeof(buf))
> };
>
> ret = i2c_transfer(priv->i2c, msg, 2);
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists