[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20121007200501.757a1ce6@milhouse>
Date: Sun, 7 Oct 2012 20:05:01 +0200
From: Michael Büsch <m@...s.ch>
To: Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>
Cc: walter harms <wharms@....de>, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
rmallon@...il.com, shubhrajyoti@...com,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...radead.org>,
linux-media@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 9/13] drivers/media/tuners/fc0011.c: use macros for
i2c_msg initialization
On Sun, 7 Oct 2012 18:50:31 +0200 (CEST)
Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr> wrote:
> >> @@ -97,10 +96,8 @@ static int fc0011_readreg(struct fc0011_priv *priv, u8 reg, u8 *val)
> >> {
> >> u8 dummy;
> >> struct i2c_msg msg[2] = {
> >> - { .addr = priv->addr,
> >> - .flags = 0, .buf = ®, .len = 1 },
> >> - { .addr = priv->addr,
> >> - .flags = I2C_M_RD, .buf = val ? : &dummy, .len = 1 },
> >> + I2C_MSG_WRITE(priv->addr, ®, sizeof(reg)),
> >> + I2C_MSG_READ(priv->addr, val ? : &dummy, sizeof(dummy)),
> >> };
> >>
> >
> > This dummy looks strange, can it be that this is used uninitialised ?
>
> I'm not sure to understand the question. The read, when it happens in
> i2c_transfer will initialize dummy. On the other hand, I don't know what
> i2c_transfer does when the buffer is NULL and the size is 1. It does not
> look very elegant at least.
Well its use case is if you only care about the side effects and not the actual data
returned by the read operation.
--
Greetings, Michael.
PGP encryption is encouraged / 908D8B0E
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (837 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists