[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAKFga-erNuJ8_aLtd1b0JS1YwX1LrsCEJjEeOT67V0AqLHj_SQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 7 Oct 2012 09:43:58 +0200
From: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...il.com>
To: pageexec@...email.hu
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Roland McGrath <roland@...k.frob.com>, spender@...ecurity.net
Subject: Re: Updated: [PATCH] hardening: add PROT_FINAL prot flag to mmap/mprotect
2012/10/6 PaX Team <pageexec@...email.hu>:
> sadly, this is not true at all, for multiple reasons:
>
.. snip ...
>
> cheers,
> PaX Team
>
So can I summarize your position as that there is no merit at all in
the ability to inhibit future permissions of existing mappings?
--
Ard.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists