linux-kernel - Re: Re: 3.4.10 i915 [GM45] regression

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1349617561.16173.85.camel@deadeye.wl.decadent.org.uk>
Date:	Sun, 07 Oct 2012 14:46:01 +0100
From:	Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
To:	Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>
Cc:	Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	Herton Ronaldo Krzesinski <herton.krzesinski@...onical.com>,
	Andreas Sturmlechner <andreas.sturmlechner@...il.com>,
	stable@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Re: 3.4.10 i915 [GM45] regression

On Fri, 2012-09-28 at 08:16 +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 10:25 PM, Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
> >> I think the conclusion looking at the bug report
> >> (https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=54575) is
> >> that the commit 0d8957c8a90bbb5d34fab9a304459448a5131e06 should be
> >> reverted on 3.4, please correct me if I'm wrong.
> >
> > Daniel, do you agree with this?
> 
> Yeah, seems like the sanest thing to do given the situation and lack
> of any understanding what's actually going on.

So presumably this will also need to be reverted for 3.0 and 3.2?  Or is
there something very weird about i915 in 3.4?

Ben.

-- 
Ben Hutchings
You can't have everything.  Where would you put it?

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (829 bytes)