[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20121008084544.GA1695@udknight>
Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2012 16:45:44 +0800
From: Wang YanQing <udknight@...il.com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, mmarek@...e.cz,
linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
rdunlap@...otime.net, yann.morin.1998@...e.fr, sakiwit@...il.com,
lacombar@...il.com, lucas.demarchi@...fusion.mobi, dave@....org,
paul.gortmaker@...driver.com, crquan@...il.com, bpoirier@...e.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3]mconf: Add Save button
On Mon, Oct 08, 2012 at 10:28:32AM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 08, 2012 at 03:22:49PM +0800, Wang YanQing wrote:
> > With one terminal, I can do:
> > 1: make menuconfig
> > 2: ajust and use "Save" button to save .config
> > 3: use CRTL-Z(konsole) to "menuconfig" run in background
> > 3: make && test kernel
> > 4: fg or "%1" to resume the menuconfig
>
> I understand all that, but why do you think your usecase should be
> in the kernel? I still fail to see its relevance for the majority of
> people.
No, I don't think it is only my usecase. Use fg,CRTL-Z is very normal
in terminal or in vt(console), without save button you have to exit
menuconfig every time you want to save .config.
By the way,just a quick test, qconfig, xconfig, nconfig all have the
Save button, why do them exist if we follow your opinion?
Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists