[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <29959.1349713526@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
Date: Mon, 08 Oct 2012 17:25:26 +0100
From: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc: dhowells@...hat.com, "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>,
linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the ia64 tree with the asm-generic tree
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
> Today's linux-next merge of the ia64 tree got a conflict in
> arch/ia64/include/asm/Kbuild between commit e7a570ff7dff ("asm-generic:
> Add default clkdev.h") from the asm-generic tree and commit f68301fee715
> ("UAPI: (Scripted) Disintegrate arch/ia64/include/asm") from the ia64
> tree.
>
> I fixed it up (see below - I am not sure if this is the correct fix) and
> can carry the fix as necessary (no action is required).
It is.
"header +=" and "genhdr +=" belong in the UAPI Kbuild; "generic +=" belongs in
the original Kbuild.
In his pull request, Arnd said:
There may be a few small merge conflicts between Mark's patch and the
following arch header file split patches. In each case the solution
will be to keep the new "generic-y += clkdev.h" line, even if it ends
up being the only line in the Kbuild file.
David
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists