linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] printk: drop ambiguous LOG

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <50732F8A.9090109@cs.tu-berlin.de>
Date:	Mon, 08 Oct 2012 21:54:50 +0200
From:	"Jan H. Schönherr" <schnhrr@...tu-berlin.de>
To:	Kay Sievers <kay@...y.org>
CC:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] printk: drop ambiguous LOG_CONT flag

Am 08.10.2012 21:24, schrieb Kay Sievers:
> On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 4:56 PM, Kay Sievers <kay@...y.org> wrote:
>> On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 4:49 PM, "Jan H. Schönherr"
> 
>>> Given that I'm able to fix the racing case, would you be in favor of
>>> this approach, or should we stick to the earlier version?
>>
>> I'm open to everything that makes sense. Let's see how it looks and we
>> can decide when we have something that passes the tests.
> 
> Jan,
> any updates, did you try something else?
> Or should we merge the first version for now?

I'm working on it, though I cannot spend as much time as I want. :)

My current version does mostly well for race-printk()s, now. But
there's still one issue to resolve and some polishing to do.

If we can afford to wait a little longer, we might get a nicer
solution (and avoid a possible mostly-revert later).

Regards
Jan

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/