linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 8/10] memory-hotplug : remove page table of x86

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <m2d30tvatv.fsf@firstfloor.org>
Date:	Sun, 07 Oct 2012 21:37:00 -0700
From:	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
To:	Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@...fujitsu.com>
Cc:	<x86@...nel.org>, <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
	<linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-s390@...r.kernel.org>,
	<linux-sh@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org>,
	<cmetcalf@...era.com>, <sparclinux@...r.kernel.org>,
	<rientjes@...gle.com>, <liuj97@...il.com>, <len.brown@...el.com>,
	<cl@...ux.com>, <minchan.kim@...il.com>,
	<akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>,
	<wency@...fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 8/10] memory-hotplug : remove page table of x86_64 architecture

Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@...fujitsu.com> writes:
> +			}
> +
> +			/*
> +			 * We use 2M page, but we need to remove part of them,
> +			 * so split 2M page to 4K page.
> +			 */
> +			pte = alloc_low_page(&pte_phys);

What happens when the allocation fails?

alloc_low_page seems to be buggy there too, it would __pa a NULL 
pointer.

> +		if (pud_large(*pud)) {
> +			if ((addr & ~PUD_MASK) == 0 && next <= end) {
> +				set_pud(pud, __pud(0));
> +				pages++;
> +				continue;
> +			}
> +
> +			/*
> +			 * We use 1G page, but we need to remove part of them,
> +			 * so split 1G page to 2M page.
> +			 */
> +			pmd = alloc_low_page(&pmd_phys);

Same here

> +			__split_large_page((pte_t *)pud, addr, (pte_t *)pmd);
> +
> +			spin_lock(&init_mm.page_table_lock);
> +			pud_populate(&init_mm, pud, __va(pmd_phys));
> +			spin_unlock(&init_mm.page_table_lock);
> +		}
> +
> +		pmd = map_low_page(pmd_offset(pud, 0));
> +		phys_pmd_remove(pmd, addr, end);
> +		unmap_low_page(pmd);
> +		__flush_tlb_all();
> +	}
> +	__flush_tlb_all();

This doesn't flush the other CPUs doesn't it?

-Andi

-- 
ak@...ux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/