[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20121008213850.GL2631@ghostprotocols.net>
Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2012 14:38:50 -0700
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...stprotocols.net>
To: David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...nel.org,
peterz@...radead.org, fweisbec@...il.com,
Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Dong Hao <haodong@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/12] perf kvm: handle realloc failures
Em Mon, Oct 08, 2012 at 02:34:55PM -0600, David Ahern escreveu:
> On 10/8/12 2:19 PM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> >>+ prev = event->vcpu;
> >> event->vcpu = realloc(event->vcpu,
> >> event->max_vcpu * sizeof(*event->vcpu));
> >> if (!event->vcpu) {
> >>+ free(prev);
> >> pr_err("Not enough memory\n");
> >Unfamiliar way of doing it, usually we do it like:
> > vcpu = realloc(event->vcpu, event->max_vcpu * sizeof(*event->vcpu));
> > if (!vcpu) {
> > pr_err("Not enough memory\n");
> > return -1;
> > }
> > event->vcpu = vcpu;
> >I.e. we don't trow away the old value of event->vcpu.
>
> right. Command is going to exit on a failure, so leaving the old
> value does not have any impact. I can leave the old if you want it
> for consistency.
I think do it in the familiar way for consistency.
- Arnaldo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists