linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] regulator: TPS51632: Add tps51632 regulator driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <5073BF39.5020008@nvidia.com>
Date:	Tue, 9 Oct 2012 11:37:53 +0530
From:	Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@...dia.com>
To:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
CC:	"lrg@...com" <lrg@...com>,
	"sameo@...ux.intel.com" <sameo@...ux.intel.com>,
	Venu Byravarasu <vbyravarasu@...dia.com>,
	"axel.lin@...il.com" <axel.lin@...il.com>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] regulator: TPS51632: Add tps51632 regulator driver

On Tuesday 09 October 2012 11:44 AM, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 06, 2012 at 08:47:46PM +0530, Laxman Dewangan wrote:
>
> Actually...
>
>> +	if (pdata->dvfs_step_20mV)
>> +		control |= TPS51632_DVFS_STEP_20;
>> +	tps->desc.uV_step = TPS51632_VOLATGE_STEP_10mV;
> Shouldn't the dvfs_step_20mV setting affect the uV_step size?
The dvfs_step_20mV will only effect for the control through DVFS (PWM).
The voltage control an voltage base register will till use the 10mV steps.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/