[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20121009071823.GA19159@elgon.mountain>
Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2012 10:18:23 +0300
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
To: John Stultz <johnstul@...ibm.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [patch] time: cast ->raw_interval to u64 to avoid shift overflow
We fixed a bunch of integer overflows in timekeeping code during the 3.6
cycle. I did an audit based on that and found this potential overflow.
Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
---
I'm not super familiar with this code so please review my work
carefully.
diff --git a/kernel/time/timekeeping.c b/kernel/time/timekeeping.c
index 5ce06a3..1d1ee67 100644
--- a/kernel/time/timekeeping.c
+++ b/kernel/time/timekeeping.c
@@ -1113,7 +1113,7 @@ static cycle_t logarithmic_accumulation(struct timekeeper *tk, cycle_t offset,
accumulate_nsecs_to_secs(tk);
/* Accumulate raw time */
- raw_nsecs = tk->raw_interval << shift;
+ raw_nsecs = (u64)tk->raw_interval << shift;
raw_nsecs += tk->raw_time.tv_nsec;
if (raw_nsecs >= NSEC_PER_SEC) {
u64 raw_secs = raw_nsecs;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists