[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-id: <50739615.9080205@samsung.com>
Date: Tue, 09 Oct 2012 05:12:21 +0200
From: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>
To: Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>
Cc: Rabin Vincent <rabin@....in>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: CMA and zone watermarks
Hello,
On 10/9/2012 5:10 AM, Minchan Kim wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 08, 2012 at 05:41:14PM +0200, Rabin Vincent wrote:
>> It appears that when CMA is enabled, the zone watermarks are not properly
>> respected, leading to for example GFP_NOWAIT allocations getting access to the
>> high pools.
>>
>> I ran the following test code which simply allocates pages with GFP_NOWAIT
>> until it fails, and then tries GFP_ATOMIC. Without CMA, the GFP_ATOMIC
>> allocation succeeds, with CMA, it fails too.
>
> Good spot. By wrong zone_watermark_check, it can consume reserved memory pool.
That was the main reason for the Bartek's research.
>> Logs attached (includes my patch which prints the migration type in the failure
>> message http://marc.info/?l=linux-mm&m=134971041701306&w=2), taken on 3.6
>> kernel.
>>
>
> Fortunately, recently, Bart sent a patch about that.
> http://marc.info/?l=linux-mm&m=134763299016693&w=2
>
> Could you test above patches in your kernel?
> You have to apply [2/4], [3/4], [4/4] and don't need [1/4].
AFAIR without patch [1/4], free cma page counter will go below zero and
weird thing will happen, so better apply the complete patchset.
Best regards
--
Marek Szyprowski
Samsung Poland R&D Center
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists