[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1349802833.24256.25.camel@gandalf.local.home>
Date: Tue, 09 Oct 2012 13:13:53 -0400
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-rt-users <linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org>,
Carsten Emde <cbe@...dl.org>
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] 3.6.1-rt1
On Tue, 2012-10-09 at 18:19 +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>
> > I've started looking at playing with the NAPI code again, and trying to
> > see if I can add an ENAPI interface (Even Newer API), where the driver
> > uses its own interrupt thread, and instead of having the polling in the
> > network softirq, it can do the polling in its own thread.
>
> It's pretty close to the behaviour I enforced with this change. Let's
> play with that and figure out what influence it has on the network
> throughput performance on RT. That needs probably a different
> scheduling scheme than what Carsten needs for his deterministic
> behaviour.
>
I was actually looking at the change for mainline, not for -rt ;-)
-- Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists