[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5074725F.6090804@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 09 Oct 2012 14:52:15 -0400
From: Sasha Levin <levinsasha928@...il.com>
To: Aristeu Rozanski <aris@...hat.com>
CC: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, dan.carpenter@...cle.com,
fengguang.wu@...el.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] xattr: prevent NULL ptr deref warnings in __simple_xattr_set
On 09/14/2012 04:58 PM, Aristeu Rozanski wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 01:55:55PM -0700, Tejun Heo wrote:
>> On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 01:54:34PM -0700, Tejun Heo wrote:
>>> On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 09:35:54PM +0200, Sasha Levin wrote:
>>>> Prevent warnings generated by smatch due to unchecked dereference of
>>>> 'new_xattr' in __simple_xattr_set().
>>>
>>> Isn't this an actual bug w/ or w/o smatch? Remove request (NULL
>>> @value) w/o XATTR_REPLACE for an non-existent node would end up
>>> calling list_add() on NULL, right? If so, please collapse these two
>>> patches and mention the actual bug instead of smatch warning.
>>
>> And can somebody please make that function less confusing? -
>> restructuring / commenting whatever. It's doing something simple.
>> It's not supposed to be this confusing.
>
> I'll work on that.
>
As it's still happening in linux-next, should I send a simple patch to fix it along
with Tejun's comments? Or is the rewrite of __simple_xattr_set() behind the corner?
Thanks,
Sasha
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists